E E Hatch, S K Willis, A K Wesselink, E M Mikkelsen, M L Eisenberg, G J Sommer, H T Sorensen, K J Rothman, L A Wise, Male cellular telephone exposure, fecundability, and semen quality: results from two preconception cohort studies, Human Reproduction, 2021;, deab001,

Abstract below. For full article, please visit the Journal of Human Reproduction.

 

ABSTRACT

 

STUDY QUESTION

To what extent is exposure to cellular telephones associated with male fertility?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Overall, we found little association between carrying a cell phone in the front pants pocket and male fertility, although among leaner men (BMI <25 kg/m2), carrying a cell phone in the front pants pocket was associated with lower fecundability.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Some studies have indicated that cell phone use is associated with poor semen quality, but the results are conflicting.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Two prospective preconception cohort studies were conducted with men in Denmark (n = 751) and in North America (n = 2349), enrolled and followed via the internet from 2012 to 2020.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

On the baseline questionnaire, males reported their hours/day of carrying a cell phone in different body locations. We ascertained time to pregnancy via bi-monthly follow-up questionnaires completed by the female partner for up to 12 months or until reported conception. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between male cell phone habits and fecundability, focusing on front pants pocket exposure, within each cohort separately and pooling across the cohorts using a fixed-effect meta-analysis. In a subset of participants, we examined selected semen parameters (semen volume, sperm concentration and sperm motility) using a home-based semen testing kit.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

There was little overall association between carrying a cell phone in a front pants pocket and fecundability: the FR for any front pants pocket exposure versus none was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.0.83–1.05). We observed an inverse association between any front pants pocket exposure and fecundability among men whose BMI was <25 kg/m2 (FR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59–0.88) but little association among men whose BMI was ≥25 kg/m2 (FR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90–1.22). There were few consistent associations between cell phone exposure and semen volume, sperm concentration, or sperm motility.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Exposure to radiofrequency radiation from cell phones is subject to considerable non-differential misclassification, which would tend to attenuate the estimates for dichotomous comparisons and extreme exposure categories (e.g. exposure 8 vs. 0 h/day). Residual confounding by occupation or other unknown or poorly measured factors may also have affected the results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Overall, there was little association between carrying one’s phone in the front pants pocket and fecundability. There was a moderate inverse association between front pants pocket cell phone exposure and fecundability among men with BMI <25 kg/m2, but not among men with BMI ≥25 kg/m2. Although several previous studies have indicated associations between cell phone exposure and lower sperm motility, we found few consistent associations with any semen quality parameters.

For full paper, please visit the Journal of Human Reproduction.